Aula Total TVBuscarConfiguraciónAPK Android

Unit 4: Future matters

Future challenges, plans, predictions, conditions and possible solutions.

Lecciones

Estrategias para comprender al escuchar
55 min
Funciones del lenguaje al hablar
55 min
Estrategias para comprender al leer
55 min
Funciones del lenguaje al escribir
55 min

Diagnóstico

Preguntas disponibles: 8. En Smart TV se muestran como material de práctica con solución desplegable.

¿Cuál título coincide mejor con un texto sobre reconocer noticias falsas?
  1. Three Ways to Check Online Information
  2. My Favourite Sport and the Equipment I Use
  3. A Recipe for a Traditional Family Meal
  4. Ancient Buildings and Their Architectural Styles
Solución: El título anticipa de forma directa el contenido.
¿Qué herramienta puede ayudar durante la revisión sin reemplazar tu juicio?
  1. An automatic tool accepted without reading its suggestions.
  2. A random word generator.
  3. A dictionary or spell checker used to verify doubtful words.
  4. A calculator for every sentence.
Solución: Las herramientas sirven para comprobar, pero la decisión final debe revisarse.
¿Cuál oración contiene información relevante para un correo de viaje?
  1. Our reservation number is 4827 and check-in begins at 2:00 p.m.
  2. My favourite colour is blue, which does not help with a travel reservation.
  3. Triangles are interesting, but this information is unrelated to the trip.
  4. My password is private information and is not relevant to the travel email.
Solución: La información se relaciona directamente con la reserva.
¿Cuál oración usa “going to” correctamente?
  1. They going to installing bins.
  2. They are going install to bins.
  3. They are going to install new recycling bins.
  4. They is going to install bins.
Solución: La estructura correcta es subject + be + going to + verbo base.
¿Cuál oración mantiene un registro claro y respetuoso?
  1. If you are unsure about a message, just do whatever seems fastest and avoid asking anyone else for help.
  2. If you are unsure about a message, ask a trusted adult or teacher for help.
  3. Only stupid people make mistakes online.
  4. Never ask anyone anything.
Solución: La primera ofrece una recomendación respetuosa y útil.
¿Cuál secuencia representa correctamente el proceso de escritura?
  1. Publish → plan → delete → draft → ignore.
  2. Edit → publish → invent topic → plan.
  3. Draft → publish immediately → never revise.
  4. Plan → draft → revise → edit → publish.
Solución: El proceso avanza desde planificación hasta publicación.
¿Cuál cierre funciona para una reseña breve?
  1. Overall, the hostel exists and this is the end of my review.
  2. Overall, the hostel is a good option for students who want a central and affordable place.
  3. Overall, the hostel is perfect for every person in every possible situation.
  4. Overall, I will finish without giving the reader any final evaluation of the hostel.
Solución: El cierre sintetiza valoración y público apropiado.
¿Cuál first conditional está bien escrito?
  1. If the temperature will rise, we use will energy.
  2. If temperature rose, will use more energy tomorrow in this pattern.
  3. If rising temperature, we will used energy.
  4. If the temperature rises, we will use more energy for cooling.
Solución: La condición va en presente y el resultado con will.

Evaluación de unidad

Preguntas disponibles: 16. En Smart TV se muestran como material de práctica con solución desplegable.

¿Qué detalle mejora una historia sobre un problema digital?
  1. What happened, how the character reacted and how the problem was solved.
  2. A list of unrelated colours that never connects with the digital problem.
  3. Several random equations that do not explain what happened in the story.
  4. Only the character’s name repeated several times without describing any event.
Solución: Una narración necesita eventos y resolución conectados.
Revisa: “In my country people greet with a handshake however customs vary.” ¿Cuál versión es más clara?
  1. In my country, people often greet with a handshake; however, customs vary.
  2. In my country people greet however handshake customs.
  3. However in my country because customs.
  4. In my country, people greets with a handshake; however the sentence still has a subject-verb agreement error.
Solución: La versión corrige concordancia y separa adecuadamente el contraste.
¿Cuál oración evita un error de concordancia?
  1. The rooms were clean and the staff was friendly.
  2. The rooms was clean and staff were friendly one person.
  3. The rooms were cleans.
  4. The staff were friendlys.
Solución: La primera mantiene formas correctas para rooms y staff.
¿Cuál frase expresa preferencia de forma clara?
  1. I prefer public transport because it reduces the number of cars on the road.
  2. I prefer public transport, but the sentence does not explain any reason for that preference or connect it to the context.
  3. Public transport prefer me.
  4. I am prefer transport.
Solución: prefer + objeto y because permiten expresar y justificar preferencia.
¿Cuál párrafo está mejor conectado?
  1. I received a link. Blue. Tomorrow. Password.
  2. I received a suspicious link. First, I checked the sender. Then I deleted the message and reported it.
  3. First I deleted the message. Then, before that, I checked the sender after I had already reported everything.
  4. Suspicious because the message and no action.
Solución: Los conectores ordenan acciones relacionadas y completas.
¿Qué comentario de revisión es más útil?
  1. Make the whole text better, without identifying what should change or where.
  2. Add an example in paragraph two to explain how the tradition has changed.
  3. I do not like the paragraph, but I will not explain what could improve it.
  4. Change everything in the text, even the parts that already support the purpose.
Solución: El comentario identifica lugar y mejora concreta.
¿Cuál texto distingue hecho y opinión?
  1. The ticket is the best in the universe, so the sentence treats an opinion as a fact.
  2. The ticket costs $5,000. In my opinion, it is good value for a two-hour tour.
  3. My opinion costs $5,000, which confuses a personal judgement with a ticket price.
  4. Everything I write is a fact, even when the statement cannot be verified.
Solución: Se separa un dato verificable de una valoración personal.
¿Cuál revisión mejora esta oración: “Electric cars are quiet they can still create traffic.”?
  1. Electric cars are quiet because however traffic.
  2. Electric cars are quiet; however, they can still create traffic.
  3. Electric cars quiet they traffic.
  4. However electric cars are quiet because no contrast.
Solución: however conecta correctamente las dos ideas contrastantes.
¿Cuál opción evita una afirmación exagerada?
  1. A strong password makes every account impossible to attack.
  2. Passwords solve every online problem.
  3. A strong password can reduce the risk of unauthorized access.
  4. One password is safe for all accounts forever.
Solución: “can reduce the risk” expresa una afirmación razonable sin absolutismos.
Antes de publicar, ¿qué comprobación final es importante?
  1. Only change the font colour.
  2. Add unrelated information and extra examples even when they do not match the purpose or the intended audience.
  3. Confirm that the final version matches the purpose and audience and has no obvious language errors.
  4. Remove the title even if it helps the reader.
Solución: La revisión final combina adecuación comunicativa y corrección.
¿Cuál oración desarrolla un problema y una solución?
  1. We got lost, but the sentence never explains what happened next or gives any action that could solve the problem.
  2. Directions because lost maybe.
  3. We got lost, so we asked a police officer for directions.
  4. We asked because no problem existed.
Solución: La segunda acción resuelve el problema planteado.
¿Cuál párrafo combina plan, consejo y condición de forma correcta?
  1. We are going to start a school garden. Students must brought gloves. If it is dry, we watering every afternoon.
  2. We will to start and students should bringing if it will dry.
  3. We are going to start a school garden. Students should bring gloves. If the weather is dry, we will water the plants every afternoon.
  4. Garden because future, gloves maybe.
Solución: Las tres funciones aparecen con estructuras correctas y coherentes.
¿Cuál texto breve cumple mejor un propósito real?
  1. Reminder: The media project will be ready sometime soon. Upload something when you remember, but no deadline is given.
  2. This is text about no deadline.
  3. I like projects because projects.
  4. Reminder: The media project is due on 18 August. Upload one file and check that your name is visible.
Solución: El mensaje contiene propósito, fecha e instrucción concreta.
¿Cuál cambio mejora coherencia entre dos oraciones?
  1. Add “However” before the second sentence even when both sentences support exactly the same idea and there is no contrast.
  2. Use “because” without a cause.
  3. Insert a random date.
  4. Add “For example,” before a sentence that illustrates the previous idea.
Solución: El conector debe reflejar la relación real entre las ideas.
¿Cuál mini párrafo es más coherente?
  1. The beach was beautiful because the bus was late. Tomorrow we visited the old town and yesterday the wind will be strong.
  2. The wind because and stayed no subject.
  3. Town centre was beach and nothing happened.
  4. The beach was beautiful, but the wind was strong. We stayed for an hour and then returned to the town centre.
Solución: Las dos oraciones mantienen tema, contraste y secuencia.
¿Cuál cierre escrito propone una solución con cautela, sin prometer demasiado?
  1. This plan will solve every environmental problem forever, even if nobody uses the system or changes any other behaviour.
  2. The plan cannot fail under any condition.
  3. One bin will eliminate all waste.
  4. This plan could reduce waste if students and staff use the system consistently.
Solución: could + condición evita una afirmación absoluta y expresa una posibilidad razonable.
Aula Total · versión compatible con navegadores de Smart TV. Los códigos curriculares técnicos se conservan internamente pero no se muestran al estudiante.